Comments

• 

  empi (2009-11-01 01:14:51)

  Why don't you write bus types in the way we do?

   
• torqmatic (2009-11-01 11:52:25)

  What's the matter?

   
• 

  empi (2009-11-01 20:08:08)

  Volvo B10BLE / Ikarus EAG E94

   
• torqmatic (2009-11-01 22:44:00)

  Well, I think this is indifferent... Everybody knows which is the body and which is the chassis.

   
• 

  Alojz (2009-11-02 18:04:50)

  But that's a rule. The beginners with public transport hobby think inversely...

   
• torqmatic (2009-11-03 12:01:41)

  What kind of rule? The official name of these buses in Hungary just simple Ikarus E94, E95, etc. without the chassis - this is just an additional information, which you can find in the data sheet of the vehicle.

   
• 

  decomposed05 (2009-11-03 13:19:51)

  I think there is little problem. In Hungary there is common name Ikarus E94, E95. But in Finland the same buses they call Volvo B10BLE / Ikarus EAG E94. I don't know how it should be correct but I notice that there is problem. For example: http://www.phototrans.eu/14,365280,0,Scania_L94UB_6x2___Ikarus_EAG_E94_4.html
  We should discuss and make agreement in this area.
  How it is in hungary?

   
• torqmatic (2009-11-03 20:37:52)

  As I said before, it is irrelevant, but in my opinion it is easier to find or identify a bus by the body... So we usually write just the body.

   
• 

  empi (2009-11-03 23:20:16)

  Unfortunately in the United Kingdom and Scandinavian countries chassis is more important and the body is additional information. But personally I think exactly like you.

   
• 

  decomposed05 (2009-11-04 14:40:23)

  It depends on approach, like everything.

   
• VM (2009-11-17 22:17:22)

  Is there a photo of that STA colored Trabant?

   

Send Your Comment

Your name:

Your message:

By sending this form you are accepting the rules of this website

User functions

Share It: